Drawing Down - Arizona Schools Panic More than A Student's Hand-drawn Picture Of A Gun
Within the news lately, a middle school student - a 14 year old boy, to be precise - was suspended from Arizona Schools because of a drawing he produced while sitting in class. No teacher wants to find their student doodling, but need to admit that not all students will likely be as enamored of their subject as the teacher is.
The Arizona Schools district the boy attends features a zero tolerance policy regarding weapons; this consists of drawing them, or even writing about them. In response to the Columbine massacre in 1999, most Arizona Schools have some version of such a policy in place. (Roughly 96% of all Arizona Schools have a zero-tolerance policy.)
Understandably, schools have to send the message that it isn't okay to bring weapons to school. No one desires to see one more Columbine. We have to do all in our energy to cease the violence, and this need to include educating students regarding the harm an atmosphere of fear can do. Students who go to college every day afraid for their lives because they do not know if they will be attacked or not are not finding out, which is the principle goal for attending college in the very first spot. Arizona Schools realize this, and have sent the message that they are going to tolerate no weapons, in any kind, even on paper.
Supporters of zero-tolerance policies in spot in Arizona Public Schools (and across the nation) say that this sends the message that the schools are concerned concerning the safety of their students, and are pro-active in the education and prevention of violence in the schools. They think that such a policy, as well as the punishments, ought to be on view for the world to find out. They really feel that this can frighten the students into behaving themselves.
The truth is, this message conflicts with the factors zero-tolerance policies are in place in such systems as the ones in Arizona Schools. Supporters believe that the worry of becoming punished will "scare them straight.
Detractors to zero-tolerance policies in Arizona Schools and elsewhere have many issues. They worry that the policies are unfair, rigid, produce fear for students, and infringe upon a person's correct to express themselves. Even though it is important to have a protected and safe learning environment, it really is simple to see that person consideration must be offered to some circumstances just like the 1 involving the student from Arizona Schools. Those opposed to zero-tolerance policies like the one particular in place for Arizona Schools object because of the probability of punishing students who may possibly have created mistakes, as opposed to those organizing to commit a criminal act. A 14-year-old boy (or girl) is definitely an enigma; peer pressure, function load at college, and wildly fluctuating hormones are all new challenges that these young teens need to cope with. These children aren't known for their excellent decision producing capabilities; the case on the Arizona Schools student is an instance of this.
The Arizona Schools must reconsider this boy's "infraction" and establish if he's actually and genuinely a threat. That would send a message that the Arizona Schools method is sensitive to the diversity of its students.
Within the news lately, a middle school student - a 14 year old boy, to be precise - was suspended from Arizona Schools because of a drawing he produced while sitting in class. No teacher wants to find their student doodling, but need to admit that not all students will likely be as enamored of their subject as the teacher is.
The Arizona Schools district the boy attends features a zero tolerance policy regarding weapons; this consists of drawing them, or even writing about them. In response to the Columbine massacre in 1999, most Arizona Schools have some version of such a policy in place. (Roughly 96% of all Arizona Schools have a zero-tolerance policy.)
Understandably, schools have to send the message that it isn't okay to bring weapons to school. No one desires to see one more Columbine. We have to do all in our energy to cease the violence, and this need to include educating students regarding the harm an atmosphere of fear can do. Students who go to college every day afraid for their lives because they do not know if they will be attacked or not are not finding out, which is the principle goal for attending college in the very first spot. Arizona Schools realize this, and have sent the message that they are going to tolerate no weapons, in any kind, even on paper.
Supporters of zero-tolerance policies in spot in Arizona Public Schools (and across the nation) say that this sends the message that the schools are concerned concerning the safety of their students, and are pro-active in the education and prevention of violence in the schools. They think that such a policy, as well as the punishments, ought to be on view for the world to find out. They really feel that this can frighten the students into behaving themselves.
The truth is, this message conflicts with the factors zero-tolerance policies are in place in such systems as the ones in Arizona Schools. Supporters believe that the worry of becoming punished will "scare them straight.
Detractors to zero-tolerance policies in Arizona Schools and elsewhere have many issues. They worry that the policies are unfair, rigid, produce fear for students, and infringe upon a person's correct to express themselves. Even though it is important to have a protected and safe learning environment, it really is simple to see that person consideration must be offered to some circumstances just like the 1 involving the student from Arizona Schools. Those opposed to zero-tolerance policies like the one particular in place for Arizona Schools object because of the probability of punishing students who may possibly have created mistakes, as opposed to those organizing to commit a criminal act. A 14-year-old boy (or girl) is definitely an enigma; peer pressure, function load at college, and wildly fluctuating hormones are all new challenges that these young teens need to cope with. These children aren't known for their excellent decision producing capabilities; the case on the Arizona Schools student is an instance of this.
The Arizona Schools must reconsider this boy's "infraction" and establish if he's actually and genuinely a threat. That would send a message that the Arizona Schools method is sensitive to the diversity of its students.
No comments:
Post a Comment